### 21st Century India: Fragmented System or Unified Progress?
Atul Malikram (Political Strategist)*
Mahatma Gandhi once said, “True democracy is not about a central authority ruling the state; rather, it operates with the collaboration of every individual.” Following this principle, India was divided into states, districts, and blocks to bring development to the last citizen. However, this system became so complex that it often ended up as mere political formalities, leaving common people struggling to navigate it.
Take the example of a city: The city is divided into wards, and each ward elects a representative called a councilor, responsible for minor development work in areas like education, health, and infrastructure. Each councilor is allotted a fund called the “councilor fund” to address ward-specific issues. Above the councilor is the mayor, and above that, the MLA (Member of Legislative Assembly) and MP (Member of Parliament), each with their own allocated funds, meant to support development in overlapping territories.
This overlap creates a lack of clarity in accountability. Who is truly responsible for a task? Often, resources are divided among three representatives, and yet, projects may remain incomplete. This convoluted structure reflects a fragmented system similar to pre-independence India.
The solution lies in a clear delegation of responsibilities. Funds should be allocated to each representative for defined tasks within their area, with public access to this information. Social media and digital platforms can be leveraged for transparency, allowing citizens to track fund usage and specific projects. When responsibilities are clear and accountability shared, this fragmented system can transform into a path of unified progress.
साभार :
© CopyRight Pressnote.in | A Avid Web Solutions Venture.